« Hume, Foucault, Becker, (and Spinoza) on our fundamental and obvious interests | Main | Hobbes on Natural Equality »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bill Wringe

‘That which having no dependence on our thought is coincident or coextended with some part of space’ - why wouldn’t a shadow count as a body on this account?


I suspect the definition also includes a silent 'and has volume' (since space has dimensions). But perhaps it's the coloration of shadows that puts them in the accident category.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Here's a link to my past blogging (and discussions involving me) at: New APPS.


Blog powered by Typepad