« Hume, Foucault, Becker, (and Spinoza) on our fundamental and obvious interests | Main | Hobbes on Natural Equality »

09/20/2022

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bill Wringe

‘That which having no dependence on our thought is coincident or coextended with some part of space’ - why wouldn’t a shadow count as a body on this account?

ERIC SCHLIESSER

I suspect the definition also includes a silent 'and has volume' (since space has dimensions). But perhaps it's the coloration of shadows that puts them in the accident category.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Here's a link to my past blogging (and discussions involving me) at: New APPS.

Categories

Blog powered by Typepad