« Covid Diaries: An Optimistic Intermezzo full of joy | Main | On When the Rector (Huizinga) canceled a Nazi »

02/21/2022

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

F. Contesi

This may well be a (few) step(s) in the right direction but some of the problems (i.e. opacity and referee assignment) with the refereeing process would seem to remain---or even be exacerbated. Publishing more papers and adding prize selection without changing the refereeing process would do that. Changing the refeering process would still be required, e.g. by way of outsourcing refereeing to a transparent and public Internet hive mind, such as the one advocated by https://doi.org/10.1086/719117 , and implementable through https://freelosophy.github.io/ .

The comments to this entry are closed.

Here's a link to my past blogging (and discussions involving me) at: New APPS.

Categories

Blog powered by Typepad