« 28 March 1979: Foucault's Rational Choice Analysis of Science (XXXVI) | Main | 28 March 1979: Foucault on Locke's World Historical Conceptual Shift (XXXVII) »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

David Duffy

As your quote makes clear, Haldane is pointing out that Rhesus incompatibility is strongly genetic in nature despite the negative parent-offspring correlation. A colleague pointed out a similar pattern for the correlation between sex of a parent and that of the offspring, that extends to the classical twin design as well! Studying other classes of relative pairs makes things clearer, and various statistical models are routinely fitted that test for such effects (eg sibling phenotypic reciprocal interaction). These aren't problems for eugenics qua eugenics, but for non-experimental genetics in general, eg much human genetics.

You would probably know that the Annals of Human Genetics itself was renamed from the Annals of Eugenics in 1954.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Here's a link to my past blogging (and discussions involving me) at: New APPS.


Blog powered by Typepad