« Cheating and American Public Life (about Baseball, mostly--okay, and a bit of Trump) | Main | On Platonic Corpses, Xunzi, and anger via Amy Olberding and Agnes Callard »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Joe McCarron

I am not sure it is best to think our goal should be to convince those who disagree with us. It may be good enough to just identify where we disagree. People have different goals so it makes sense that they will disagree about the importance of different arguments.

Eric Schliesser

I don't you disagree with Liam, really. The fundamental aim is to facilitate mutual understanding. To identify where we disagree is conducive to that.
But if -- ignoring the wisdom of Liam's position -- one is in the business of refuting others, one should aim to be convincing to them.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Here's a link to my past blogging (and discussions involving me) at: New APPS.


Blog powered by Typepad