« Status Quo Bias, Classical Liberalism, And the Original Sin of Neo-Liberalism | Main | The Possible, the Prefigurative, and the Impossible in Graeber's Debt »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Great piece! Bentham's Defence of Usury, as you know, corrects Aristotle by pointing out that in borrowing a daric one enables oneself to generate the 'offspring' (τοκος) by buying a cow that, unlike money, can give birth. But still there is something paradoxical in this, and an apparent violation of the PSR. The thought is this: you were able to raise the calf because you borrowed, but you were only able to borrow because you could raise the calf. There is an explanatory circle here, and the metaphysical fishiness of the whole affair was enough to provoke many Renaissance commentators to suppose that profiting from debt involved some sort of violation of the order of nature.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Here's a link to my past blogging (and discussions involving me) at: New APPS.


Blog powered by Typepad