« On Late Analytic Philosophy: or the age of David Lewis | Main | On Pogge, Polygraphs, and Pseudo-Science »

05/19/2016

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Matt

are you familiar with this book? Other than noticing it at Eastern APA last winter and thinking it looked interesting, I can say nothing about it, but it sounds like it might be of some interest to you. (People on Amazon are skeptical, but I'm not sure that is of much epistemic value on its own.)

Eric Schliesser

What book?

Matt

Hmm, link didn't go in, I guess. I'd meant this one:

http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10616.html

Vasilis Politis

I am new to this discussion, and can't immediately get it into focus.
Am I right in thinking there are different questions here, or at least they seem quite different on the face of it?
There is the question of the limits of the philosophical life, especially in relation to the religious life (as with the reference to parts of Christianity and Al-Ghazali).
And then the question you start off with, that of academic distortion of other traditions in the name of academic philosophy.
What's the connection?
And then there the question of Platonism and whether it is exclusive - a pet subject of mine I confess.
I don't want to deny that Platonism may be exclusive - may exclude other conceptions of philosophy or a non-philosophical life.
But the question is 'how'.
I don't think, by identifying the philosophical life with the life of reason; as, for Plato, there is an irrational, erotic and even mad source of philosophy.

Eric Schliesser

Yes, there are different issues here (although I hope they are connected). Here's one connection: the distortions even displacements/effacements of other traditions by philosophy generate rejections of philosophy. (That's not the only ground of rejection of philosophy.)
I think the question how Platonism (and traditions inspired by it) excludes others is a tricky one. In the post I note two strategies: (i) the opposition to Sophism; (ii) the opposition to the rustic. I think (i) is rejected because it is not oriented toward truth/good; (ii) is rejected, well, not entirely clear how. I agree that it is not done by identifying the philosophical life with the life of reason.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Here's a link to my past blogging (and discussions involving me) at: New APPS.

Blog powered by Typepad